Get In Touch

Recent Decisions

FATF Grey List Update – February 2026: Kuwait and Papua New Guinea Added to Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring

This list identifies jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering (ML), terrorist financing (TF), and proliferation financing (PF).

These jurisdictions have made a high-level political commitment to work with the FATF and address the issues swiftly through agreed action plans. Being on the list means increased monitoring by the FATF and relevant FATF-style regional bodies (FSRBs), but it does not require enhanced due diligence from other countries – instead, the FATF encourages a risk-based approach using the provided information. The organisation stresses that legitimate activities, such as humanitarian aid, non-profit operations, and remittances, should not be disrupted.

In this February 2026 update, the FATF added two new jurisdictions: Kuwait and Papua New Guinea. No jurisdictions were removed. Algeria and Namibia were noted as having substantially completed their action plans, warranting on-site verification visits to confirm sustained implementation. Several others (e.g., Haiti, Syria, Yemen) continue under prior statements with limited or deferred progress due to various challenges.

The full list of jurisdictions under increased monitoring as of February 2026 includes:

  • Algeria (substantially completed action plan; on-site assessment pending)
  • Angola
  • Bolivia
  • Bulgaria
  • Cameroon
  • Côte d’Ivoire
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Haiti
  • Kenya
  • Kuwait (newly added; committed February 2026)
  • Lao PDR
  • Lebanon
  • Monaco
  • Namibia (substantially completed action plan; on-site assessment pending)
  • Nepal
  • Papua New Guinea (newly added; committed February 2026)
  • South Sudan
  • Syria (ongoing monitoring; no on-site visit possible)
  • Venezuela
  • Vietnam
  • Virgin Islands (UK)
  • Yemen (ongoing monitoring; no on-site visit possible)

For each jurisdiction, the FATF outlines remaining or addressed deficiencies (e.g., risk understanding, supervision of financial institutions/DNFBPs, beneficial ownership transparency, investigations/prosecutions, targeted financial sanctions, and non-profit oversight) and progress made. The FATF welcomes commitments and urges timely completion of action plans to strengthen the global financial system against illicit finance risks.

This is the “grey list” document; a separate “black list” (High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action) exists for more severe cases requiring enhanced due diligence or countermeasures.

For the official full details, refer to the FATF website: Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring – 13 February 2026.

SRA Intervenes in Hunter’s Solicitors-Firm Shut Down, Three Solicitors Suspended

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has intervened in Hunter’s Solicitors LLP, a multi-office Home Counties firm headquartered in High Wycombe and operating across ten locations under several trading names – including Franklins Solicitors, Batemans, Colemans, and Grower Freeman. The intervention followed suspicion of dishonesty on the part of the

OPBAS Report Highlights Ongoing AML Supervision Gaps in Legal and Accountancy Sectors

The Office for Professional Body Anti-Money Laundering Supervision (OPBAS) has published its latest report on the 2024/25 supervisory period, finding that while Professional Body Supervisors (PBSs) are performing better than at any point since OPBAS was established in 2018, significant weaknesses remain – particularly around enforcement. OPBAS oversees 25

Solicitor Struck Off for Falsifying Note to Cover Court Lateness

Solicitor Alexander Gallagher (admitted 2016, self-employed advocate for LPC Law) arrived 30 minutes late to a 2pm hearing at Wandsworth County Court, leading to adjournment. To conceal his mistake, he sent a false attendance note claiming he had requested adjournment due to lack of instructions/documents, which was untrue. He

Probate solicitor paid his £77,000 tax bill with client funds

A London probate solicitor has been struck off following the discovery of extensive client account misappropriation totalling nearly £1.2 million. Andrew Brian Alexander Cooper, admitted in 2007 and based at Streathers Solicitors in Baker Street, was found by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal to have engaged in “deliberate and calculated”

Firm fined £68,000 for processing CA$23m through client account

Key Details: Firm: Scott-Moncrieff & Associates (ScoMo) – a virtual law firm run by former Law Society president Lucy Scott-Moncrieff Fine: £68,000 (plus £1,350 costs) Main Breach: Additional AML Failures: Regulatory Context: Current Status: Risk Assessment: SRA cited the risk that the client account “may have been used for

UK Finance defends conveyancing fee for lender instructions

UK Finance has confirmed that, from June 2026, solicitors and conveyancers acting for mortgage lenders in residential property transactions will be charged £50 plus VAT per year per user to access the UK Finance Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook – the central set of instructions they must follow when acting on

Solicitor banned for certifying documents online

Solicitor Struck Off for Online Document Certification Joe Morgan, a solicitor admitted in 2019 and director of Document Certifier Ltd, has been struck off by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal for certifying documents without seeing the originals. The Issue: Morgan ran a website where clients uploaded documents (such as bank

SRA to require annual accountants’ reports

SRA’s Decisions The SRA is consulting on a return to mandatory submission of all accountants’ reports. The proposals include: Additional proposals on “more timely” information requirements for firms significantly changing their profile through mergers, acquisitions or sales will be published next year. Industry Response A recent SRA spot-check revealed

SRA Warning: Expect Enforcement Action for Lack of Mazur Response

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has issued a stark warning that firms conducting reserved activities without authorisation and failing to address the implications of the Mazur judgment can expect enforcement action. The SRA’s Position In guidance issued last week, the regulator acknowledged there has been “concern and confusion” in the